IMPRINT
Emi Kusano
The Administration of Nostalgia

Artist
EMY KUSANO
Lives
TOKYO, JAPAN
Words
G—G EDITORS
Published
JANUARY 2026
Emi Kusano's images present themselves as records, and they do it without asking permission. Here is the office in mint and beige. Here is the obedient geometry of desks, devices, cables. Here is a golden Buddha presiding over a room that cannot distinguish between devotion and retail. Everything is lit for clarity, not closeness. Skin, plastic, lacquer, and CRT glass all appear with a certainty that feels almost administrative. The picture does not behave like memory, which is usually a broken edit.
The proposition is that the visual codes of Japanese modernity: corporate efficiency, consumer abundance, kawaii domesticity, sacred ritual, systems that manage the person rather than the other way around, and that rebuilding these systems with total fidelity is enough to make that management visible. Kusano does not satirise or annotate. She reconstructs. An office worker stands centred in a turquoise room flanked by obsolete printers, the polish of a company brochure intact. Behind another, three giant identical faces line the wall like lenticular advertising, and the worker becomes indistinguishable from the display infrastructure she occupies. Elsewhere the logic escalates: a man in a suit sits wired into electronic components growing from his torso; a woman's skull disappears under circuit boards and monitors; a figure walks a crowded street with a camera apparatus fused to a painted mask-face. The body does not resist the system. It completes it. In the accumulation works the same mechanism operates through quantity: a figure in a red kimono sits centred and still while flowers, ceramics, food, and figurines fill every surface to the edge of the frame. A golden shrine is consumed by packaging. The person remains composed, and that composure is precisely what makes the administration legible.
Cindy Sherman established that credibility comes from format; a centred frame reads as official, a neutral expression reads as documentary, period props act as shorthand for time. Kusano works inside that logic but extends it: the format does not merely produce credibility, it produces compliance. The figure is not performing a role. The figure has been filed. The difference between Sherman's character and Kusano's subject is the difference between wearing a costume and being worn by one.
What remains is a double sensation: recognition and doubt. You feel you have seen this before, and you understand that it was assembled, not lived. Kusano tests how easily belief can be rebuilt from familiar formats, and the answer is uncomfortable: almost effortlessly. The nostalgia is not a mood. It is an operating system, and the person inside it is running as intended. ◾️











































